Septic rejuvenation — a failing system that didn't need replacing

Line exposed for inspection. Excavation to establish the real layout, since county records for the system did not match what was in the ground.
The problem. The homeowner had been told their tank was cracked and the system needed to be replaced. We looked at the tank first. It was sound — no cracks, no failure. The problem was downstream, in the drainfield.
The complication. County records for the system were inaccurate, so there was no reliable document of how it had actually been built. We exposed portions of the drainfield and scoped it to establish the real layout before proposing anything.
What we found. Part of the failure traced back to the original design rather than to age or neglect. Repairing the symptom would have left the underlying cause in place, so the fix had to correct the design itself so the system would work the way it was supposed to.
Outcome. The system was repaired and its service life extended — and the homeowner avoided the cost of installing a new drainfield in the reserve area.
La Pine, Oregon · CCB #260092